>>Return-Path: >Errors-To: >X-Sender: pmitch@pop.primenet.com >Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 10:16:52 -0700 >To: (Recipient list suppressed) >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell >Subject: PLEASE FORWARD TO AUSTRALIA > >Paul Mitchell, private attorney general on behalf >of the People of the United States of America, >makes this unsolicited recommendation to >the People of Australia, jointly and >severally, to entertain an immediate and >unconditional moratorium on the surrender of >all firearms, until such time as a lawful >national referendum can be scheduled, and >implemented, on the question now before you. > >Respectfully submitted, > >/s/ Paul Mitchell > >Counselor at Law, federal witness, >and private attorney general > > > >At 12:03 PM 8/30/97 -0400, you wrote: >> >>Dear Fellow Patriot: >> >>I have tried to limit my e-mails recently to only items which pertain to the >>main thrust of The American Resistance Movement, with the IRS being the >>starting point. However, I am making an exception due to the significance of >>this information. >> >>I recently wrote to an Austrailian on my mailing list asking for an "on the >>scene account" of what was going on in Australia with gun control. His >>account shows that the Australians have guts and there is going to be a >showdo >>wn as early as October 1, 1997 if the Police go door to door as they have >>promised to do. The writer says that only 5% of the guns have been bought >>back, turned in, etc. in some of the states. >> >>Notice where the money comes from to buy the guns: The criminal government >>raises taxes (stealing it from everybody) and then pays gun owners SEVERAL >>TIMES what the guns are worth. We need to study the history of gun control >>in Australia so that we can avoid further infringements here! >> >>Here is the information: >> >>======================== >> >> >>Terry, >> >> >>Thanks for assistance. Here's the scoop on Australian gun control. >> >>The Australian Federal Government as you know mandated a turn-in of any >>semi-automatic shoulder weapon (all semi rifles and shotguns) and banned pump >>shotguns as well. To assure greater compliance, the Feds here created an >>elaborate "buy-back" scheme that allocated millions of dollars to fund the >>buy-back. To generate the funds, the Feds increased the tax levy that >>individuals pay for the Federal health care benefit by 1%. Gun owners have >>been offered several times what their guns are worth to assure greater >>compliance. So, if you own a FAL pattern rifle (commonly made here at the >>government "Lithgow" arsenal for the Australian army and called SLR's or >>L1A1's), you'd be offered $2500 for this rifle. I had considered buying one, >>but the same rifle is selling in the U.S. for about $700. Even parts for >>banned weapons are fetching considerable sums. In addition, the Fed here is >>offering complete amnesty to anyone turning in previously banned or >>unregistered firearms. Large numbers of machine guns and semi-auto rifles, >>previously illegal are coming out of hiding. The money offered is >>irresistable to many. >> >>However, the scheme has been rated an overall failure, and has many nervous >>as to what the next step will be. Here's why...... >> >>Several Australian states didn't require gun registration over the previous >>years. States such as New South Wales and Queensland registered the gun owner >>and not the weapons he or she purchased. In these states, the numbers of >>banned weapons sold is known, but not to whom. THERE ARE NO FEDERAL GUN >>CONTROL RECORDS HERE, gun registration and licensing had always been >>controlled by the individual states. The numbers of banned weapons being >>turned in in those states which didn't have gun registration records has been >>DISMAL. There are no official estimates, but many gun stores estimate >that th >>e turn-in of banned weapons is probably less than 5%. >> >>The reason why this concerns many is due to what the government is pondering >>as their "next step." Several states have openly stated that door-to-door gun >>round-ups are next. The policemen (whom I come here to train) are extremely >>concerned about this, as many are openly sympathetic regarding the rights of >>gun owners and believe the gun laws are absurd. Deadlines for the turn-in >>vary from state to state, but the last deadline >>appears to be the one set by the state of West Australia, which is October >>1st, 1997. What each state government does from then is open to speculation, >>but many believe the Federal government will be publicity sensitive to any >>major upheaval prior to the 2000 Olympic Games being held in Sydney. >> >>There is word that New Zealand is considering a similar gun buy-back scheme >>that will be patterned after the Australian model. >> >>Stay tuned... >> >>========================== >> >> >>CONGRESS NEEDS TO KNOW NOW THAT WE WILL BE EVEN LESS COOPERATIVE THAN THE >>AUSTRALIANS. >> >>IF THEY TRY TO TAKE OUR GUNS THERE WILL BE MASSIVE RESISTANCE AND MAJOR LOSS >>OF LIFE. >> >>COULD THIS EVER BE JUSTIFIED AS MAKING US SAFER? >> >>P.S.: If you have not taken steps to free yourself from the IRS and to help >>us take back America, please read the material at: >> >> Why Fight The >Conspira >>cy? >> >>Then take action to help us win this battle. >> >>If you have already taken the first steps, an update and the next steps will >>be coming shortly. Thanks for all your help. The response has been >>unbelievable! >> >>Keep in mind that efforts of The American Resistance Movement are aimed at >a T >>OTAL SOLUTION. We start with the IRS but our goal is to eliminate 100% of >>all rules governing any weapon any soldier could be expected to carry with >>the exception of those individuals who committed felonies using a gun. >> >> I fear organized crime (the government) a lot more than I fear a few random >>nutballs! >> >> >>Terry W. Stough >> The American >Resistance Mo >>vement >>(770) 641-9042 >> >> > >======================================================================== >Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness >B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine > >tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night >email: : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU >website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now >ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best > Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone > Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this > >As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall >not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. >======================================================================== >[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > > ****************************************** Donations Needed- Am One Person Working Alone International Advocates for Health Freedom John C. Hammell, Legislative Advocate 2411 Monroe St.#2 Hollywood, FL 33020 USA 800-333-2553, 954-929-2905, FAX 954-929-0507, FAX ON DEMAND 954-927-8795,jham@concentric.net http://www.pnc.com.au/~cafmr/hammell/index.html